Program Integrity solutions

Protecting Medicaid-Funded Homecare from
Fraud, Waste & Abuse 

Medicaid-funded homecare is uniquely vulnerable to fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA). To address these FWA risks, states and payers are looking to go beyond Electronic Visit Verification (EVV). That’s where HHAeXchange comes in. We deliver a smarter, data-driven solution to strengthen program integrity.   

A Comprehensive,
Data-Powered Approach 

HHAeXchange’s Program Integrity tools use EVV data as a foundation to uncover issues, resolve conflicts, and recover lost funds. Our solution empowers payers, providers, and state agencies with actionable insights to help surface suspicious activity faster—supporting better decisions, streamlined investigations, and reduced costs.

The solution includes: 

  • Visit Compliance Oversight: Flags conflicting visits, overlapping services, authorization issues, and GPS anomalies like out-of-geofence clock-ins.  
  • FWA Risk Scoring: Ranks providers based on a composite score of visit conflicts, GPS violations, and other risk factors to target top offenders.  
  • Provider Screening: Checks provider data with state and federal exclusion lists to flag high-risk entities.  
  • Authorization Monitoring: Tracks over- and under-utilization of approved services to manage costs and ensure plan alignment.  
  • Conflict Management Tool: Payers and providers collaborate on visit anomalies using an integrated tool that highlights issues across caregivers, locations, and visit times.  

Hear From Our Customer

HHAeXchange has been an excellent partner to the District’s Medicaid program. HHAeXchange’s solutions-oriented approach and readiness to develop tailored data solutions have been instrumental in opening the door for new avenues to root out fraud, waste, and abuse.

DC Program Integrity Office

Real-Time Visibility. Actionable Insights. Proven Outcomes.  

By pulling data from HHAeXchange and alternative EVV systems, our platform delivers a real-time view into provider performance and potential fraud cases before payments are released. The result? Faster intervention, smarter oversight, and stronger program sustainability. 

FWA dashboard

This sample FWA dashboard shows how our solution brings suspicious activities to your attention sooner.

Targeting the
“Vital Few” 

HHAeXchange’s monthly FWA Risk Scorecard uses weighted indicators—such as visit conflicts, manual edits, and authorization violations—to rank providers by risk level. This helps agencies focus investigative resources where they matter most. 

Benefits That Go Beyond Compliance

Efficiency

Replaces manual tasks with real-time coordination among stakeholders.  

Visibility

Centralizes EVV and claims data for easy analysis and compliance tracking.  

Cost Control

Flags billing conflicts before claim submission, ensuring payment only for verified services. 

Improved Outcomes

Combines EVV and monitoring to enhance care quality and improve health outcomes.    

What is “program integrity” in the context of homecare billing and services? 

Program integrity in this context refers to protecting Medicaid-funded homecare services from fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA). It involves making sure that visits occur, services are delivered and documented correctly, authorizations are followed, and billing matches service delivery. 

How does HHAeXchange use EVV data to help detect suspicious activity? 

EVV (Electronic Visit Verification) data is used as the foundation for identifying irregularities — e.g. overlapping visits, visits outside of clock-in geofence, or services performed outside authorized schedules. This data, combined with other sources (claims, authorizations), is used to flag anomalies for review. 

What is the Risk Scorecard, and how is it used?

It’s a composite scoring system that takes multiple indicators (such as visit conflicts, authorization violations, GPS/geofence anomalies, manual edits) and weights them to estimate which providers are most likely to have improper practices. This helps target oversight or audits to the highest risk providers. 

Is EVV data alone sufficient for program integrity, or do we need additional data sources?

EVV is necessary but not always sufficient. Program integrity is improved when EVV data is combined with claims data, authorizations, provider screening (for example cross-checking exclusion lists), and monitoring tools that detect under- or over-utilization of authorized services. HHAeXchange’s solution does use multiple data sources.  

If an agency is using an alternate EVV system, can we still see the data in the program integrity tool? 

Yes—the Platform supports ingesting data from “in-house or alternative EVV systems” so that the dashboards and FWA-detection tools can still see a consolidated view.